Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Air Flight 263

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Lion Air Flight 263

Lion Air Flight 263 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable incident, completely fails WP:Aircrash (yes i know it isn't policy, but it is an excellent guideline for inclusion criteria), completely unnecessary article Petebutt (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

• Comment Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Aircraft accidents and incidents states: "Because this is an essay and not policy and also because it should not be applied to stand-alone accident articles (my emphasis), it is recommended that it not be cited at Articles for Deletion discussions for either keeping or deleting. Biscuittin (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - this was an overrun of 30 metres. The aircraft suffered minimal to no damage. Not notable, or even worth mentioning at the aircraft type, airline or airport articles. Mjroots (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable aviation incident....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. While this may have been covered in a few WP:RS immediately after the fact, I do not see any lasting coverage to impart encyclopedic notability. WP:NOTNEWS appears to apply here. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

• Delete non notable. Nordic Dragon 08:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
• Delete. A runway overrun does not make this notable. If the aircraft was written off in this incident, then maybe, but it didn't. So it fails WP:GNG. Class455fan1 (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.