Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Polisseni (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Greg Polisseni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
spam from Voidz. non notable person, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Most of the mass of sources in the article are not reliable sources. The few independent reliable sources that are used only mention Polisseni in passing, no depth of coverage anbout him. His film "work" is just a few executive producer amongst multiple others. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:51, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This, like many of the articles created by the same professional spammer via numerous sockpuppets, is an article with a very concerted effort to give a spurious impression of notability by Wikipedia:Bombardment with large numbers of references. However, on closer examination, it turns out that every one of the references suffers from one or more of the following defects: (1) not a reliable source; (2) not an independent source; (3) barely mentions Polisseni; and even, in some cases, (4) does not mention Polisseni at all. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article was nuked a few months back and also had gone to AfD before that. WP:PAID sock was involved last time and the article rises from the ashes with another group of paid spammers. For clerical purposes: WP:GNG - Fails WP:RS - Fails PeterWesco (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- More Details The last time this article was nuked was in January 2013. Old article name: Greg_Polisseni_(producer) the last banned spammer to create the article was: Amuletandtalisman PeterWesco (talk) 16:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I did find some local coverage like this, but not enough to say notability is met. -- Whpq (talk) 15:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.