[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Inbox Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a film production company that fails to meet notability. The article is sourced only to the company's web site. My search for coverage only turns up passing mentions about them when covering some films where the company was involved. This falls well short of being significant coverage. Whpq (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Mentions and churnalism is what I find in a search. Nothing that would fall under WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Unsourced promotional article for non-notable company. They may become notable someday, but when that happens, someone can write a new article. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 09:46, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)